Yes, I agree with the XSL (not XSLT)
reference.
CSS3 is not yet a Recommendation, and interoperable
support is
only guaranteed for those referenced by XSL and the
HTML DTD.
paul
From: Michael Priestley
[mailto:]
Sent: Monday, 2006 May 22
22:37
To: Paul Prescod
Cc: ;
Esrig, Bruce (Bruce); Paul Prescod; Robert D Anderson; Su-Laine
Yeo
Subject: [dita] Updated feature 20
>
> We proposed to take out the list of colour
names in the
> specification. They could be included by reference as
suggested by
> Paul Grosso.
>
> On the other hand, the
link to the XSLT specification implies that
> DITAVAL processors should
support the syntaxes defined here:
>
>
http://www.w3.org/TR/xsl/slice5.html#expr-color-functions
>
> We
should be explicit about what syntaxes we support. I personally
> would
like to know whether XSL will synchronize with SVG and CSS as
> defined
here:
>
> http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-color/#svg-color
>
> Somehow we need a clear definition of what syntax the attribute
> supports. It doesn't matter much what the syntax
is.
I don't have a decision here. In the
absence of input, I am picking the existing XSLT reference because the list of
colors is shorter.
