Thanks Robert for this information. I'll just specialize <imagemap> then.
I'll make a note to add this to our future features list.
Best Regards,
Gershon
-----Original Message-----
From: Robert D Anderson [mailto:]
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 6:49 PM
To:
Subject: Re: [dita] Formal Imagemaps
Hi Gershon - the problem is that imagemap is specialized from the <fig>
element, and fig does not allow fig as a child. So, fig cannot legally allow
imagemap either.
This does mean that the imagemap could legally include a title element on
its own, but it's not part of the specification - you could probably bring
that up as a 1.2 or 1.3 enhancement.
Robert D Anderson
IBM Authoring Tools Development
Chief Architect, DITA Open Toolkit
(507) 253-8787, T/L 553-8787
"Gershon L
Joseph"
<gershon@tech-tav To
.com> <>
cc
05/10/2006 10:45
AM Subject
[dita] Formal Imagemaps
Please respond to
<gershon@tech-tav
.com>
One of my clients requires <imagemap> to have a caption. For now, I'll
specialize <fig> by adding <imagemap> as an optional child, but I was
wondering what the rational was for not making <imagemap> available in
<fig>?
PS. I'm not asking for this to be done in DITA 1.1. I just want to
understand the thinking at the time in case I'm missing something here...
Best Regards,
Gershon
---
Gershon L Joseph
Member, OASIS DITA and DocBook Technical Committees Director of Technology
and Single Sourcing Tech-Tav Documentation Ltd.
office: +972-8-974-1569
mobile: +972-57-314-1170
http://www.tech-tav.com
