RE: [dita] Groups - New Action Item #0023 Embedding version numbersin cat...

I mostly agree with Eliot (though I have a different
opinion of public identifiers).

I add one comment below.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eliot Kimber [mailto:] 
> Sent: Monday, 2005 September 12 17:10
> To: 
> Subject: Re: [dita] Groups - New Action Item #0023 Embedding 
> version numbersin cat...


> Thus, the general practice is that namespace URIs are 
> invariant and do 
> not include any sort of version identifier. That is, DITA is 
> DITA in all its versions.

I certainly agree with this in principle and would
like to see us maintain this.  However, if we decide
to do some renaming under the guise of "naming convention 
cleanup" in DITA 2.0, we might find ourselves deciding 
to bump the namespace.

paul