MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
dita message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Re: [dita] Keywords in DITA
From: Dana Spradley <>
To: Dana Spradley <>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 10:05:11 -0800
erratum: "otherwise you're sending mixed
messages..."
In fact, it seems to me this whole discussion was provoked by a bad
definition for <keyword> in the language spec, which defined it
as a keyword in the technical programming sense, while from the
<keywords> definition you would have expected it to be defined as
in DocBook.
We could solve the entire issue by just revising that <keyword>
definition to be what <keywords> expects.
If people feel there is a need for keywords in the technical sense to
migrate beyond the confines of syntax diagrams, then that's a separate
issue for the folks working on the Programming Domain vis-a-vis the
<kwd> element - which *is* defined as a keyword in the technical
programming sense.
--Dana
Dana Spradley wrote:
I agree on the DocBook part, but disagree on the <keyword>
in other contexts is more like a word from an API or language clause.
The <kwd> element exists for that.
<keyword> outside <keywords> should have the same meaning
it does within - outwise you're sending mixed messages to authors, and
mixing up the use.
JoAnn Hackos wrote:
Sounds like a good solution.
JoAnn
JoAnn T. Hackos, PhD
President
Comtech Services, Inc.
710 Kipling Street, Suite 400
Denver, CO 80215
303-232-7586
http://www.comtech-serv.com
From: Rob
Frankland [mailto:]
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 9:29 AM
To: 'Paul Prescod'; JoAnn Hackos; 'Don Day'
Cc:
Subject: RE: [dita] Keywords in DITA
I agree,
having followed this thread. Your suggested solution covers both use
cases. I believe the largest number of users will want the HTML/Docbook
usage and this enables the programmer writers to meet their needs as
well.
Rob
From: Paul Prescod
[mailto:]
Sent: Tuesday, March
08, 2005 5:46 PM
To: JoAnn Hackos;
Don
Day
Cc:
Subject: RE: [dita]
Keywords in DITA
Okay, an
emerging consensus seems to be that <keyword> in <keywords>
means <keyword> in the HTML/Docbook sense.
http://www.docbook.org/tdg/en/html/keyword.html .
It is typically hidden from the user as metadata and embedded in the
HTML meta tag.
<keyword>
in other contexts is more like a word from an API or language.
Should we
just document it that way? If so, I can suggest some wordings.
Paul Prescod
Follow-Ups:
Re: [dita] Keywords in DITA
From: Erik Hennum <>
References:
RE: [dita] Keywords in DITA
From: "JoAnn Hackos" <>
Re: [dita] Keywords in DITA
From: Dana Spradley <>
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
