wrote:
> DITA, however, has several key distinguishing characteristics, compared
> with S1000D:
>
> 1) Information type specialization.
Rather than comparing DITA and S1000D at the element type level, it
might be more productive to simply retrofit the DITA class mechanism to
S1000D--this would provide much of the unique value of DITA compared to
S1000D (since both provide comparable content structures) and could be
done without affecting any existing applications or document instances.
This is one reason I pushed for breaking the specialization mechanism
out as a separate specification--it has tremendous value independent of
the value of DITA's topic-based vocabulary and could be usefully applied
to any information types.
That is, there is a general requirement for some sort of architecture
mechanism, at least for technical documentation (if not for all XML
applications), and DITA provides just such a mechanism in a form that is
both well adapted for the XML Web-based world, that is proven in
practice, and that requires minimal extra effort to use and implement.
Cheers,
Eliot
--
W. Eliot Kimber
Professional Services
Innodata Isogen
9390 Research Blvd, #410
Austin, TX 78759
(512) 372-8122
www.innodata-isogen.com
