Next in thread →
Next in month →
Re: [dita-comment] @id attribute on Learning2 elements
Hi Julio, I've double checked with Eliot Kimber and John Hunt from the learning subcommittee, and confirmed that this general issue is the same thing I mentioned in response to your comment on lcSequencing2. All of the elements that show a required @id attribute had the required attribute in the old learning domain, but this was relaxed in the learning2 domain. The examples for the new elements (not using @id) are correct, and the attribute descriptions should be updated to match the more relaxed model in the grammar files. Thanks for catching this - Robert D Anderson IBM Authoring Tools Development Chief Architect, DITA Open Toolkit (http://www.dita-ot.org/) "Julio Vazquez" ---08/05/2015 08:25:02---Please review which elements truly require the @id attribute and remove this attribute from those el From: "Julio Vazquez" <> To: <> Date: 08/05/2015 08:25 Subject: [dita-comment] @id attribute on Learning2 elements Please review which elements truly require the @id attribute and remove this attribute from those elements that don’t require it. Julio J. Vazquez Senior Content Analyst Vasont Systems A TransPerfect Company Skype: tpt_jvazquez +1 717-793-3895 www.vasont.com The information in this email is confidential and intended for those to whom it is addressed.
Next in thread →
Next in month →