Hi TC,
I object to this motion, based on the original goal to address several down-selection use-cases within TAXII 2.1 which have proposals ready for TC evaluation that have not been resolved. The most recent proposal was provided in Dec 2019
and with “suggestion/edit” permissions regranted to TC members can be added for review with the TC documents.
As a member of this TC and member (in an addition to representative of other members) within the STIX/TAXII community, I truly appreciate and value all the work we have contributed to get to this point and anticipate supporting the remaining
use-cases needed to increase the success of this TC and the ecosystems that will rely on what we provide.
Looking forward to TAXII 2.1,
-Marlon
From: Taylor, Marlon
Sent: Wednesday, January 8, 2020 5:37 PM
To: Justin Stewart <>; Bret Jordan <>; OASIS CTI TC Discussion List <>
Subject: Re: [cti] TAXII 2.1 CS Motion
We have made several accomplishments however moving forward with TAXII 2.1 a CS without additional support for TAXII Filtering which has been long requested capability throughout the community and can be accomplished via a minor spec change
would be a disservice to the TC and TAXII community.
Looking forward to TAXII 2.1,
-Marlon
Marlon Taylor
Strategy & Resources
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency
Office: 703 235-3614 | Cell: 202 603-8541 | Email:
From: <> on behalf of Justin Stewart <>
Sent: Wednesday, January 8, 2020 5:14:11 PM
To: Bret Jordan <>; OASIS CTI TC Discussion List <>
Subject: Re: [cti] TAXII 2.1 CS Motion
I second this motion.
Thanks,
Justin Stewart
CTI-TC Interop SC co-chair
From:
<> on behalf of Bret Jordan <>
Date: Wednesday, January 8, 2020 at 12:21 PM
To: OASIS CTI TC Discussion List <>
Subject: [cti] TAXII 2.1 CS Motion
All,
Over the past couple of years the CTI TC has done a lot of work on the TAXII 2.1 specification. During this time the TC has released 10 working drafts, 4 committee specification drafts, and 3 public reviews. The last public review for
TAXII 2.1 was completed in December with no new comments or issues.
I am also pleased to report that all required sponsorship activities for TAXII 2.1 are complete. We now have at least 2 independent implementations of all new features and changes. Further all implementers have reported that the design
works and it is implementable.
At this time, I believe we are ready to move forward. As such:
I move that the TC approves the CTI Chair(s) and TAXII Subcommittee Chair to request that the TC Administration hold a Special Majority Ballot to approve TAXII 2.1 Working Draft 10 / Committee Specification Draft 04 contained in
https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/document.php?document_id=66205&wg_abbrev=cti as a Committee Specification.
Thanks,
Bret
PGP Fingerprint: 63B4 FC53 680A 6B7D 1447 F2C0 74F8 ACAE 7415 0050
"Without cryptography vihv vivc ce xhrnrw, however, the only thing that can not be unscrambled is an egg."
