On 09.01.2018 16:16:09, Jason Keirstead wrote:
>
> How would we get STIX 2.0 and TAXII 2.0 added to this? Anyone have
> any ideas? Or does it matter? Anyone have insights?
>
Hey, Jason -
I was one of the folks consulted by the EC. In my comments I
explicitly recommended standardizing on STIX/TAXII 2.0. I surmise that
the EC went with STIX 1.2 / TAXII 1.1 because that's what most
products support *today*.
Now if we were to see a groundswell of support for 2.0 at RSA this
year, that would likely impact the EC's position.
--
Cheers,
Trey
++--------------------------------------------------------------------------++
Director of Standards Development, New Context
gpg fingerprint: 3918 9D7E 50F5 088F 823F 018A 831A 270A 6C4F C338
++--------------------------------------------------------------------------++
--
"It is easier to move a problem around (for example, by moving the
problem to a different part of the overall network architecture) than
it is to solve it." --RFC 1925
