Re: [cti] [EXT] [cti] Location as a Top-Level SDO

From
Nicholas Hayden <>
Date
2017-06-12T14:13:07+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [cti] [EXT] [cti] Location as a Top-Level SDO
At this point why make it an SDO why not just:

3. No Location SDO and embed information in objects, and make is an “Optional' field

Since we’re creating a library, what purpose is there to create a stand alone Object?

Best Regards, Nicholas Hayden, CISSP, GICSP, CNDA, CEH, Sec+ 

Director of Engineering Anomali | anomali.com

808 Winslow St Redwood City, CA 94063

Phone: (650) 257-0867 | Twitter: @anomali

On Jun 11, 2017, at 11:58 PM, Bret Jordan <> wrote:

So if we were going to do this, we would probably need to build a library of locations by country and regions and publish them as a Committee Note and hope people just use the them for locations at the granularity of a country or group of countries. 

Bret

From:  <> on behalf of Jason Keirstead <>Sent: Sunday, June 11, 2017 7:35:18 PMTo: : Bret Jordan; ; ; : Re: [cti] Re: [EXT] [cti] Location as a Top-Level SDO
 

You are assuming that we don't create a repository of "standard" location SDOs for things like continent and country names - IE the things that people would want to share in the first place. Which, I don't see why we would not do this, seeing how we're doing it for things like CAPEC.

 

-Jason KeirsteadSTSM, Product Architect, Security Intelligence, IBM Security Systemswww.ibm.com/securityWithout data, all you are is just another person with an opinion - Unknown

 

 
----- Original message -----From: John-Mark Gurney <>Sent by: <>To: "Back, Greg" <>Cc: Bret Jordan <>, "Reller, Nathan S." <>, "" <>Subject: Re: [cti] Re: [EXT] [cti] Location as a Top-Level SDODate: Fri, Jun 9, 2017 8:36 PM 
Back, Greg wrote this message on Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 20:18 +0000:> If Location is an SDO, does that make it possible to “move” another object by versioning the Location object? That seems like a bad idea. Especially if you effectively “move” other, unrelated objects that also refer to the same Location. Even if we did make Location a TLO, we would have to mandate that people update the “_ref” fields to move an SDO, not the Location itself.>> (I haven’t made up my mind on whether I like the Location SDO in general, just pointing out one consideration).Interesting point.  Which effectively means that if you create arelationship to a location, that location should be one you own, notone that was created by someone else (unless you can trust the creatornot to do what you just described)...This means that by definition, there will be many Location SDO's forthe same location to prevent this from happeneing...--John-Mark---------------------------------------------------------------------To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC thatgenerates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php  

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php