STIX 2.0 CSD, TAXII 2.0 CSD, Opinion/IntelNote/Comment Ballots Opened

Hi all,

 

I apologize for the mixup, but the three ballots below are now good to go. Please take the time to vote on all three. The two CSD approvals are official Full Majority votes and require
 half of voting members to vote yes if we want to advance the specifications. The other ballot on comment vs. intel note and opinion is a simple majority and whichever option gets more votes will be the direction we take.

 

Thanks,

John

 

 

"Approve STIX 2.0 WD02 as a CSD and submit it for 15 day public review" has opened.

Ballot Title:
Approve STIX 2.0 WD02 as a CSD and submit it for 15 day public review

Question

Do you approve STIX 2.0 WD02 (as cited below) as a Committee Specification Draft, with the Word version as authoritative, and approve submitting the CSD for 15 days of public review?

Closing Date: Wednesday, 3 May 2017 @ 11:59 pm EDT

Description

STIX 2.0 WD02 and all associated artifacts are packaged together in https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/document.php?document_id=60594&wg_abbrev=cti

The updates contained in STIX 2.0 WD02 are captured in the public comment log https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/document.php?document_id=60593&wg_abbrev=cti

Vote

Yes

No

Abstain 

Group: OASIS Cyber Threat Intelligence (CTI) TC

Date Opened: Wednesday, 26 April 2017 @ 12:00 pm EDT

"Approve TAXII 2.0 WD01 as a CSD and submit it for 30 day public review" has opened.

Ballot Title:
Approve TAXII 2.0 WD01 as a CSD and submit it for 30 day public review

Question

Do you approve TAXII 2.0 WD01 (as cited below) as a Committee Specification Draft, with the Word version as authoritative, and approve submitting the CSD for 30 days of public review?

Closing Date: Wednesday, 3 May 2017 @ 11:59 pm EDT

Description

TAXII 2.0 WD01 and all associated artifacts are packaged together in https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/document.php?document_id=60598&wg_abbrev=cti

Vote

Yes

No

Abstain 

Group: OASIS Cyber Threat Intelligence (CTI) TC

Date Opened: Wednesday, 26 April 2017 @ 12:00 pm EDT

"Approve of the TC proceeding with the development of the comment object as a merge of the intel note and opinion objects" has opened.

Ballot Title:
Approve of the TC proceeding with the development of the comment object as a merge of the intel note and opinion objects

Question

Should the TC proceed with the development of the merged 'comment' object to capture all notes and opinions (the use cases from the previously developed intel note and opinion objects)?

Closing Date: Wednesday, 3 May 2017 @ 11:59 pm EDT

Description

The TC has been having a debate about whether an "intel note" and "opinion" are fundamentally the same object or two different objects. After extensive discussion on the mailing list, there seems to be a slight preference for merging the objects into a single
 "comment" object that would cover both use cases. A vote of 'yes' means the TC should proceed with the comment object, a vote of 'no' means the TC should proceed with the separate intel note and opinion objects.

Comment Object (if merged): https://docs.google.com/document/d/15qD9KBQcVcY4FlG9n_VGhqacaeiLlNcQ7zVEjc8I3b4/edit#heading=h.s9c08p1vu5u1

Intel Note Object (if separate): https://docs.google.com/document/d/15qD9KBQcVcY4FlG9n_VGhqacaeiLlNcQ7zVEjc8I3b4/edit#heading=h.74spnst8naxc

Opinion Object (if separate): https://docs.google.com/document/d/15qD9KBQcVcY4FlG9n_VGhqacaeiLlNcQ7zVEjc8I3b4/edit#heading=h.haeazu2sh3sq

Vote

Yes

No

Abstain 

Group: OASIS Cyber Threat Intelligence (CTI) TC

Date Opened: Wednesday, 26 April 2017 @ 12:00 pm EDT