Next in thread → Next in month →

RE: Inconsistencies/typos in the specs

From
Lenk, Chris <>
Date
2017-02-23T14:39:53+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: Inconsistencies/typos in the specs
One more thing in Part 4:

·        
In the “Basic Stream Socket” socket-ext example: is_listening should be a boolean, not a string.

 

From:  [mailto:]
On Behalf Of Piazza, Rich

Sent: Tuesday, 14 February, 2017 2:31 PM

To: 

Subject: [cti] Inconsistencies/typos in the specs

 

Some things to clean up on the next editing pass…

 

·        
Part 2:

o  
Attack pattern example:  external_reference should have an external_id property

o  
Too nit-picky? The create time of the malware in the coa example is after the create time of the relationship that refers to it

o  
Same example:  the malware object has a “relationship_type” property, not a “name” property

o  
2016-01-201T17:00:00Z
in the report example has a 3 digit day

o  
Probably too late to fix, but the threat-actor example is pretty skimpy

·        
Part 4

o  
home_dir in unix-account-ext isn't a ref to a directory object, but just a string

o  
the x509 extension is named inconsistently:  most other extensions are "foo_ext", this one is 'x509-v3-extensions-type'

o  
In the x509-certificate properties table, there is no entry for extension, even though it has one.

o  
Timestamp in pe-binary-file needs a trailing Z

o  
Windows-service-ext example should have service_name, not display_name

o  
In the x509 example, validity_not_before and validity_not_after are after subject – but that is not the order in the table.  No big deal – but examples usually follow the order in the table.  Same
 for the
Next in thread → Next in month →