Unless anyone has any objections I’ll go through the documents tomorrow and make this update.
On 8/10/16, 5:14 PM, "Back, Greg" <> wrote:
Agreed. There's also type, definition_type, and definition properties on marking-definition objects, so it's not unprecedented (and actually rather consistent).
Greg
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [mailto:] On Behalf Of
> Wunder, John A.
> Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2016 3:25 PM
> To: Terry MacDonald <>; Paul Patrick
> <>
> Cc: Kemp, David P <>;
> Subject: Re: [cti] Relationship object - name property
>
> Agreed. I think our reservations about having both “type” and
> “relationship_type” are probably very minor compared to the extra clarity
> this would bring.
>
>
>
> From: <> on behalf of Terry MacDonald
> <>
> Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2016 at 4:19 PM
> To: Paul Patrick <>
> Cc: "Kemp, David P" <>, ""
> <>
> Subject: Re: [cti] Relationship object - name property
>
>
>
> That makes sense to me to change the field from name to relationship-type,
> and would potentially help differentiate the SROs from the SDOs.
>
> Cheers
> Terry MacDonald
> Cosive
>
>
>
> On 9/08/2016 3:30 AM, "Paul Patrick" <
> <mailto:> > wrote:
>
> For a relationship, I agree with David that ‘relationship-type’ would
> be better than name
>
>
> Paul Patrick
>
>
> On 8/8/16, 11:17 AM, "
> <mailto:> on behalf of Kemp, David P"
> < <mailto:> on behalf of
> <mailto:> > wrote:
>
>
> "Threat Actor A" and "Threat Actor B" are vertex unique identifiers
> which (I assume) would be carried in the name field of those vertices.
> "related-to" is a class of edge but does not identify a specific edge, so I'd
> think that "label" or "relationship-type" is more appropriate than "name".
>
> Is an edge uniquely identified by anything other than two vertex
> IDs? If not, edges would not have names.
>
> Dave
>
>
>
>
> This email and any attachments thereto may contain private,
> confidential, and/or privileged material for the sole use of the intended
> recipient. Any review, copying, or distribution of this email (or any
> attachments thereto) by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the
> intended recipient, please contact the sender immediately and permanently
> delete the original and any copies of this email and any attachments thereto.
