RE: [cti] Agenda for August 9 Working Call

From
Piazza, Rich <>
Date
2016-08-10T15:26:40+00:00
ID
Thread
RE: [cti] Agenda for August 9 Working Call
One reason to have “description” is for named relationships that aren’t defined in the spec.  The “verb” might not fully describe the reason for the relationship.

 

From:  [mailto:]
On Behalf Of Jordan, Bret

Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2016 10:45 AM

To: Wunder, John A. <>

Cc: 

Subject: Re: [cti] Agenda for August 9 Working Call

 

 

3.  Maybe we need a new field on Relationship to capture this Verb...  If we do this, then Name and Description probably can be dropped as they will not
 be needed.  The only reason description is there, I believe, is because historically we added description to anything that had a name.