Thanks everyone. For the drafts that will go out today, we’ve used the MUST language for CybOX with an open vocabulary for other languages.
1) Yes – MUST language
2) Yes – open vocab
John
On 7/18/16, 9:03 AM, "Trey Darley" <> wrote:
On 15.07.2016 13:24:27, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
>
> The simplist solution is an open vocab, as we expand it in future
> revisions as people add support.. Similar to other parts of the
> spec...
>
> So, My votes:
>
> 1) yes
> 2) Yes - open vocab
>
For the reasons enumerated by Allan, Jason, & John-Mark, my vote is
yes on MVP and yes on open vocab.
--
Cheers,
Trey
++--------------------------------------------------------------------------++
Kingfisher Operations, sprl
gpg fingerprint: 85F3 5F54 4A2A B4CD 33C4 5B9B B30D DD6E 62C8 6C1D
++--------------------------------------------------------------------------++
--
"It is always possible to aglutenate multiple separate problems into a
single complex interdependent solution. In most cases this is a bad
idea." --RFC 1925
