I also back this decision. I am more worried about the consequences of missing something and doing it wrong, than about ramifications of not including it.
-
Jason Keirstead
STSM, Product Architect, Security Intelligence, IBM Security Systems
www.ibm.com/security | www.securityintelligence.com
Without data, all you are is just another person with an opinion - Unknown
Mark Davidson ---03/29/2016 08:16:51 AM---I’d like to second this so that we can have a clear CTI TC-wide view of opinions on this matter. I c
From: Mark Davidson <>
To: "Foley, Alexander - GIS" <>, "Wunder, John A." <>, "" <>
Date: 03/29/2016 08:16 AM
Subject: Re: [cti] Verisoning Discussion @ CTI Working Discussion
Sent by: <>
I’d like to second this so that we can have a clear CTI TC-wide view of opinions on this matter. I care more about making a decision than I do the specific outcome.
Thank you.
-Mark
From: <> on behalf of "Foley, Alexander - GIS" <>
Date: Monday, March 28, 2016 at 5:56 PM
To: "Wunder, John A." <>, "" <>
Subject: RE: [cti] Verisoning Discussion @ CTI Working Discussion
I motion that we do not consider including versioning as part of STIX 2.0, and instead wait for 2.1+ to implement it.
I’m not trying to say that we shouldn’t prepare for it, I just don’t believe we’re going to solve this issue in the next three months given the many other issues we need to figure out.
Thanks,
Alex Foley
From: [mailto:] On Behalf Of Wunder, John A.
Sent: Monday, March 28, 2016 1:58 PM
To:
Subject: Re: [cti] Verisoning Discussion @ CTI Working Discussion
It seems like another important topic is is versioning MVP (should we include it in STIX 2.0, or wait until 2.1+)?
I know that the working group leaders believe that it is, but it seems like we should talk through that as a group before digging into these deeper topics just in case the community as a whole feels differently.
From: <> on behalf of Marlon Taylor <>
Date: Monday, March 28, 2016 at 10:38 AM
To: "" <>
Subject: [cti] Verisoning Discussion @ CTI Working Discussion
Hi All,
During the CTI call tomorrow we will discuss versioning, more specifically implicit vs explicit relationships. During this discussion it will be beneficial to identify:· What’s the difference?o With Implicit Relationships - as a version is updated, the relationships of the former as passed along to the latter.
o With Explicit Relationships - as a version is updated, it is new with no prior relationships.· Is there any use-case/rationale for either?o Arguably one can state they both can result in a version update where the relationships of the former exist in the latter.· Should they be mutually exclusive?
Please join the call tomorrow to learn about and contribute to this topic.
Feel free to use this thread as a notebook for your views/questions/ideas for tomorrow’s discussion.
Marlon Taylor
Technology Services Section (TSS)
National Cybersecurity & Communications Integration Center (NCCIC)
U.S. Department of Homeland Security
This message, and any attachments, is for the intended recipient(s) only, may contain information that is privileged, confidential and/or proprietary and subject to important terms and conditions available at http://www.bankofamerica.com/emaildisclaimer. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message.
