No views here on when's best. Certainly F2F time is precious for tech progress. Looking forward to the implications-of-legislation chat, and calling in to listen, when you do have it.
Cordially Jamie
On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 10:30 AM, Barnum, Sean D. <> wrote:
While I agree with Tony that the topic is very important I would also agree with Bret here that this may best be done on one of our calls rather than f2f.
Our f2f time will be very precious.
sean
Personally, I think this sort of discussion or presentation would be best done via one of our normal monthly calls. I would not want to use expensive F2F time for something that can easily be done via a phone call. IMHO, F2F time should be reserved for things
that are painful to do remotely, over the phone, or over email.
Thanks,
On Jan 4, 2016, at 10:49, Jamie Clark <> wrote:
Thanks from us for this also, Tony. The legislation does indeed provide a whole bunch of new issues for info sharing -- but on the technical side, it certainly does look like a paved sidewalk to STIX/TAXII. * * *
James Bryce Clark, General Counsel
OASIS: Advancing open standards for the information society
https://www.oasis-open.org/staff
www.twitter.com/JamieXML
http://www.slideshare.net/jamiexml
Recent: http://j.mp/globalcyber (OASIS-World Bank cybersec conference)
Recent:
http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=66370 (UBL approved by ISO/IEC)
On Fri, Jan 1, 2016 at 6:26 AM, Tony Rutkowski
<> wrote:
Hi Mark,
Happy New Year.
Two weeks ago, a rather significant and fast
moving "baby" was left at our collective doorstep
in the form of the Cybersecurity Act of 2015. * * *
