Re: [cti] F2F Update & Call for agenda topics

From
Jamie Clark <>
Date
2016-01-04T17:49:54+00:00
ID
Thread
Re: [cti] F2F Update & Call for agenda topics
Thanks from us for this also, Tony.    The legislation does indeed provide a whole bunch of new issues for info sharing -- but on the technical side, it certainly does look like a paved sidewalk to STIX/TAXII.  

    For what it's worth, it sounds like a great idea to use a manageable part of your F2F time to talk about how the TC wants to describe its work as fitting into this US mandate -- and how to do so without losing its potential character as a global voluntary toolset as well.  

    Obviously, having posted your slideset to the TC list, it's public via our archives now.   It's good stuff, so we may share it with a few other folks for general information, with the obvious warning that it's a company's view, not necessarily representing the TC's work or viewpoint.  

    Happy new year -- cordially, Jamie

    
James Bryce Clark, General Counsel
OASIS: Advancing open standards for the information society 
https://www.oasis-open.org/staff
www.twitter.com/JamieXML
http://www.slideshare.net/jamiexml
Recent:  http://j.mp/globalcyber (OASIS-World Bank cybersec conference)
Recent:  http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=66370 (UBL approved by ISO/IEC)

On Fri, Jan 1, 2016 at 6:26 AM, Tony Rutkowski <> wrote:
Hi Mark,

Happy New Year.

Two weeks ago, a rather significant and fast

moving "baby" was left at our collective doorstep

in the form of the Cybersecurity Act of 2015.

It is arguably the most significant cybersecurity

statutory enactment for the U.S. with implications

far beyond its shores.  It has major deliverables

required in fast order early this year.  It also is tightly

bound to the work for this Technical Committee.

It seems appropriate to add this subject to the

F2F agenda - based on the attached slide material.

What has been provide here is a "deconstruction"

of the Act to identify the requirements model,

architecture, interfaces, and expressions required

by the Act.  It is worth noting that the information

exchange model here has a tight binding to OASIS

generally, and the architectures are common to

others established by many other government

established compliance obligations creating

information sharing interfaces.

The slides provide model basics, the embedded

architecture and interfaces, the exchange expressions,

timeline, and some "starter" questions and options.

A number of additional slides are attached that

provide reference information underlying those

questions and options.

best,

tony