While this topic and its implications to threat sharing are very important, it can easily be done via a phone call / webex / gotomeeting.
The reason for having a F2F is so we can solve hard design problems that require white boards, supporting drawings, and live interactions, all the things that are impossible to do via phone calls and email.
Briefings and summaries are best done via phone calls or emails.
Thanks,
Bret
Bret Jordan CISSP
Director of Security Architecture and Standards | Office of the CTO
Blue Coat Systems
PGP Fingerprint: 63B4 FC53 680A 6B7D 1447 F2C0 74F8 ACAE 7415 0050
"Without cryptography vihv vivc ce xhrnrw, however, the only thing that can not be unscrambled is an egg."
On Jan 4, 2016, at 12:01, Tony Rutkowski <> wrote:
That should read, of course, "...a topic more important..."unless one regards the Act and its implementation as irrelevant.On 2016-01-04 1:58 PM, Tony Rutkowski wrote:a F2F topic less important and time critical---------------------------------------------------------------------To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
