On 13.11.2015 15:09:23, Wunder, John A. wrote:
> This is why many standards bodies have requirements for running
> code: otherwise the temptation is too great to define specification
> requirements that are not implementable and you end up with a great
> spec that nobody will use.
>
Well said, John! +100
--
Cheers,
Trey
--
Trey Darley
Senior Security Engineer
4DAA 0A88 34BC 27C9 FD2B A97E D3C6 5C74 0FB7 E430
Soltra | An FS-ISAC & DTCC Company
www.soltra.com
--
"Every old idea will be proposed again with a different name and a
different presentation, regardless of whether it works." --RFC 1925
