Ringo,
Thanks for sending us these comments. You’re correct that granular_markings is a list of granular-marking objects, rather than ID references, so we’ll disregard your previous
comment.
Also, note that the review period for STIX 2.0 ended June 1. Your comments and everyone’s comments are still appreciated (I’m being serious, please send us any and all comments),
but they’ll be considered for STIX 2.1 rather than 2.0.
Thanks again,
John
From:
<> on behalf of ringo <>
Date: Sunday, June 18, 2017 at 8:55 PM
To: "" <>
Subject: Re: [cti-comment] missing granular_markings
Please disregard my previous comment/question. As I understand now, granular_markings is a list of granular-marking not Identifiers to such.
