Chet,
I would go with another full 30 day review. 1) We did add substantial content, and 2) I wasn’t really happy with the level of comment
we got – want to push harder this time.
Matt, Joss, and Paul, chime in if you (dis)agree.
Dr. David Snelling
Fujitsu Distinguished Engineer
Program Director Artificial Intelligence
CTO Office EMEIA
Fujitsu
Mob: +44 (0) 7590-293439
Email:
Web:
uk.fujitsu.com
Fujitsu is proud to partner with
Action for Children
P
Please consider the environment - do you really need to print this email?
From: [mailto:]
On Behalf Of Chet Ensign
Sent: Monday, December 4, 2017 8:59 PM
To:
Cc: Paul Knight <>
Subject: [coel] Question on the length of the public review
Members of the COEL TC,
We are prepping your 2nd public review package now.
Normally, subsequent public reviews are run for a minimum of 15 days. However, given that you extensively reorganized the original materials into a single document, I'm checking to see if you would like me to run it for longer.
Thanks - we'll get the review started this week either way...
/chet
----------------
Chet Ensign
Director of Standards Development and TC Administration
OASIS: Advancing open standards for the information society
http://www.oasis-open.org
Primary: +1 973-996-2298
Mobile: +1 201-341-1393
Unless otherwise stated, this email has been sent from Fujitsu Services Limited (registered in England No 96056); Fujitsu EMEA PLC (registered in England No 2216100) both with registered offices at: 22 Baker Street, London W1U 3BW; PFU (EMEA) Limited, (registered in England No 1578652) and Fujitsu Laboratories of Europe Limited (registered in England No. 4153469) both with registered offices at: Hayes Park Central, Hayes End Road, Hayes, Middlesex, UB4 8FE.
This email is only for the use of its intended recipient. Its contents are subject to a duty of confidence and may be privileged. Fujitsu does not guarantee that this email has not been intercepted and amended or that it is virus-free.
